Momo Outrun M3

MOMO Tyres in wet – Have MOMO tyres on my Hilux Dual cab ute, they feel slippy in wet conditions, especially on corners. They do feel good in dry conditions, unsafe in wet in my view. Changing today to TOYO Tyres. Unhappy. Show details

Great tyres for the price – First fitted these to a MY06 WRX because research indicated they were one of the quietest and better handling economy tyres available being a copy of the continentals. This has proved to be the case, the bonus was that they handle well wet or dry and wear well. Now with 50000kms they still have possibly 20% tread remaining and have lost nothing… Read more

in the handling department. So impressed with these tyres I then fitted them to a Mercedes E350 and have had the same experience.

Very hard Tire, with average performance, and very noisy – Hello Guys, I am from Brasil, and I have been using Momo´s tires 94w 205/55/16 for the last 10k km. The tires are really hard, and lot of vibration go to suspension, consequently reducing the suspension (springs, shock absorbers, jambs) useful life. For me, different of some internet reviews, that tires are noisy too, especially on roads with bad… Read more

pavement or parallele piped. Fortunately I don´t test the tires in extremely situations, than I have no comment about the tire´s grip;

I am comparing Momo Tires, with the last two sets of tires I had before it. Before Momo tires, I had used Michelin Primacy 3 (91V), and Bridgestone ER30(91V) in my Ford Focus. I had used Michelin and Bridgestone many times in extremely situations, like dangerous road curve, water in the road, sudden changes in direction in height velocity... And, no complain about that tires. Both lasted more than 50k km, both are noiseless, and both had good grip.

>>>> To be fair I am writing my perception about the tires after 60,000km of use. It's still noisy and hard, but I've never had a tire so durable. There is still 2mm left to reach the TWI, I am changing this tired with 70,000km. My last 2 sets of tires (Michelin Primacy 3 and Bridgestone E30) lasted 50,000km, this makes this tire have a 40% greater durability. About the grip I have had no complain so far.

Great value, but performance really drops off after about 10k – Considering thier low price the tires perform really well. I was happy with the dry grip for the first 10k kms, the wet grip has always been a bit iffy. The last 10k kms have been underwhelming and are the primary reason I wouldn't buy these tyres again. While it can be exciting, loss of traction with these tyres can happen unexpectedly, which leads me to the conclusion that they would be pretty ordinary in an emergency situation.  Show details

Low noise, High Grip, Long Life – Use on 2011 MB W204 C250. Before I bought this, it was rather difficult to find a reveiw. But at $150, it is much better that the next best Kumho. The original Conti was VERY VERY noisy, very little grip for its price and worse it only lasted 13000+ km. Rear wear was worse than front and will definitely not pass inspection. I had Kumho Ecsta on… Read more ·  1

previous c180 w203 coupe after Pirelli PZero and its was 120% better than the PZero's. But as usual when a trye is good and becomes popular, the Australian resellers increase the profit margin exponentially.

Found Momo on ebay and for 2 months, I searched for a review on them. I only found 1 customer review. Since it was cheaper than Kumho, I enquired about it and the seller said that if it did not performed as they said it would, they would gladly pro-rata for another make. Most I'd loose is $100 for 4. Due to car's staggered sizes.

I have changed so many tyres for the 35 years of driving. From what I can tell, from me waiting for the tyres to be balanced and put on, this Momo's were, for them, the easiest to balanced. I could watch them, and it took only 5 goes on the balance machine. The kumho's too more than 7 before it balanced properly and then it would loose its balance as it wears.

I've had the Momo's from about 13000 something to now, about 72000+ km. The rears are worn now, maybe another 3000 km and need to change. The fronts still have about 20%. That'll last me another 10000 km.

Noise - on the original Conti's that come with the car, Contact 5 I think, noise was unbearable as it wears. The noise overpowers the engine noise. It gets louder and louder as it wears. The grip also reduces exponentially as it wears. At about 40% thread it starts to aquaplane on small pools, NSW Sydney roads.

This Momo's have been consistant throughout its life. Tyre road noise is still low. I can hear the engine and transmission whine more than I can hear the tyre road noise. Of course, on Sydney roads, when the road is coarser that normal then I can hear the roar but not as much as the Contis. Even at 10% thread, it will aquaplane slightly but when car nanny takes over, it stops aquaplanning immediately. Whereas with the Contis, it does not matter what the car nanny does, it just aquaplanes until you almost have to stop.

Grip - What can I say, again the Momo's are consistant. The Conti's looses it grip as it wears. Car nanny comes on more often with the Contis than the Momos. In fact even at 10% rear thread, nanny does not come on until I push it to extreme.

Life - Contis lasted only 13000+ from new. Momo's I've had them on, now reading 72000+ km.

I am definitely going back to Momos.

Good at first now not so sure – Have done about 15000 Kay's on mine and the fronts are starting to de laminate on some edges. Driven sensibly by mature driver. On my BF ford ute, xl poverty pack Wouldn't go there again Not sure what I will try next time , these were a dissapointing purchase Think I will take to a dealer to discuss  Show details

Awesome tires for price. Good traction and tread wear so far – Had these tires on my 01 WRX for nearly 10 months and have done over 10,000km's. Only 280 tread wear but they are very grippy both on wet and dry and quiet. I'm yet to find out how long they'll last. Don't be put off by the cheap price and where its made. I'd recommend them to anyone.

BANG for your buck high performance tyre! – Got those tyres 5 month ago, put down 4000 km's so far. First saw them online, for rather cheap (they ARE Chinese made), so that had put me off a bit, but then again MOMO is a strong brand so I figured since Michelin/ Goodyear and all make tyres in China so i took the gamble. Boy, wasn't i surprised at how good they are! It is definitely… Read more

a high performance tyre, they are so grippy and quiet, had ContiSportContact 3 and Kumho Ku31 before, I'd rate this tire to be equals to the ContiSportContact 3 and better than the Kumho KU31, and it cost 1/2 as much as the Continental.

Good in both wet and dry. Definitely a bang for your buck high performance tyre, Grip!, Quiet, Cheap Made in China (which will put off some people), 280 tread wear rating.