- Sign in
- Write a review
Best Samsung Front Loading Washing Machines
69 listings
Samsung QuickDrive with Steam WW85M64FOPW
Price (RRP) $1,285.00
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality3.0 (1)
- Value for Money4.0 (1)
- Ease of Use4.0 (1)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 3.0 (1)
- FeaturesDoor/Lid Lock (Child-proof), Reload/Add Wash and Steam Function
- Energy Rating4 star(s)
- Water Rating4.5 star(s)
- Colour / FinishWhite
- Dimensions 850 x 600 x 697 mm
- Motor Type
- Max Spin Speed 1,400 rpm
- Number of Wash Cycles12
- StackableNo
Samsung B1045
Latest review: Thought we got a good deal and expect this machine to last much longer but not sure anymore. Our initial problem was the water filled in the tumbler was meant for washing the clothes instead it leaks
Samsung WF756UMSAWQ / WF856UHSAGD / WF856UHSAWQ · includes 3 listings
Latest review: Never buy a Samsung washing machine - just over 5 years old and it came up with an error message that was not listed in the manual but instead recommended calling Samsung Service to confirm the fault
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality1.0 (1)
- Value for Money3.0 (1)
- Ease of Use2.0 (1)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 3.0 (1)
- Noise Level3.0 (1)
Samsung WF7700N6W / WF7700N6W1 · includes 2 listings
Latest review: No complaints, we didn’t have any issue yet except the slight noice started last week which I think the drum bearing. It’s around $60 on eBay if really need to replace as the machine is still working
Samsung J843
Latest review: Bought when pregnant with my now 14 year old and it's still working fine. Washes clothes as you would expect and no problems with cycles. No maintenance issues outside of having to clean
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality5.0 (1)
- Value for Money5.0 (1)
- Ease of Use5.0 (1)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 5.0 (1)
- Noise Level4.0 (1)
Samsung WF9854RWE / WF9854RWE1 · includes 2 listings
Latest review: The mechanism that holds the inner bowl broke beyond repair after less than 4 years. Samsung eventually agreed to refund a proportion of the cost of the machine but the hurdles required by them in
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality3.5 (2)
- Value for Money2.7 (3)
- Ease of Use4.0 (3)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 4.0 (3)
- Noise Level3.3 (3)
- FeaturesDoor/Lid Lock (Child-proof)
- Energy Rating4 star(s)
- Water Rating4.5 star(s)
- Colour / FinishWhite
- Dimensions 850 x 600 x 670 mm
- Motor TypeDirect Drive (Inverter)
- Max Spin Speed 1,200 rpm
- Number of Wash Cycles12
- StackableNo
Samsung WF1702XEC
Latest review: I purchased this washer almost 2 years ago after moving to smaller apartment, my 8 kg LG front loader would not fit in this tiny shallow cupboard laundry, there is almost nothing that would. I am
Samsung J1055
Latest review: I could be one of the lucky ones, no break downs or repairs, doing about 10 loads a week on average. 4yrs service hopefully more to come. I bought this machine in 2006 when there was a $200 water
Samsung WF8750LSW
Latest review: Going well for the 9th year. Only problem during 8th year was water not getting drained. Watched some YouTube vidoes and opened up the side panels and to the water pump etc...it was some hairs
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality3.3 (3)
- Value for Money2.7 (3)
- Ease of Use4.3 (3)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 2.3 (3)
- Noise Level2.3 (3)
Samsung WF7708N6W / WF7708N6W1 · includes 2 listings
Latest review: We have been using this washing machine for 10 years without any problems. I can't believe that it is still running smoothly. Never break down. I love this machine as well as other Samsung products.
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality3.0 (2)
- Value for Money3.5 (2)
- Ease of Use5.0 (2)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 4.0 (2)
- Noise Level3.0 (2)
Samsung J1045AV / J1455AV · includes 2 listings
Latest review: I bought this washing machine way back in 2007 and its still going strong. There is 5 people living in our house so its used everyday, and never had anything go wrong with it. Build quality is solid
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality4.5 (2)
- Value for Money4.5 (2)
- Ease of Use5.0 (2)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 4.5 (2)
- Noise Level3.5 (2)
Samsung WW10H8430EW
Latest review: Washing machine only lasted 4 years was ok when it worked which was rarely clothes did come out fairly dry but for the price it was they should when it started having problems it would work somedays
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality2.3 (3)
- Value for Money2.0 (3)
- Ease of Use3.7 (3)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 3.3 (3)
- Noise Level3.3 (3)
Samsung J1455
Latest review: Had it for 5 years now. Broke down 3 times in this period. Very loud on spin cycle. I think there is much better out there than Samsung front load washing machines & I will definitely be going for a
Samsung J845
Latest review: I bought this machine from a factory seconds shop 12 years ago (2008) I can't even remember if it was new or refurbished but was $649 and it's still going strong. Even lived outside in a shed for 5
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality4.5 (2)
- Value for Money5.0 (2)
- Ease of Use5.0 (2)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 4.0 (2)
- Noise Level4.0 (2)
Samsung WF8802RPF / RSW / RPF1 · includes 3 listings
Latest review: Same as other people here. Huge BANG and then white smoke filled out apartment. Clothes are ruined and smell like toxic chemicals We informed Samsung and received an aggressive call from a woman.
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality2.0 (4)
- Value for Money2.0 (4)
- Ease of Use3.8 (4)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 2.8 (4)
- Noise Level2.5 (4)
Samsung J1045
Latest review: Bought my Samsung J1045 in 2007- my first experience with a front loader washer & cost $749. We are a family of two now and these days the wash loads range from not really soiled to slightly soiled,
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality5.0 (1)
- Value for Money5.0 (1)
- Ease of Use5.0 (1)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 5.0 (1)
- Noise Level5.0 (1)
Samsung WF1804WPC
Latest review: After having no issues for 7 yrs it now refuses to work 3E fault. Removed motor brushes and one was worn down to the brush box and the other was only 40% worn. Both parts identical in shape but
- Review Summary
- Specifications
- Build Quality1.3 (3)
- Value for Money1.3 (3)
- Ease of Use3.0 (3)
- Cleaning & Maintenance 2.7 (3)
- Noise Level3.0 (3)