??!
2 photos
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Classic

Garmin Vivoactive 3 Classic

3.0 from 3 reviews

Reviews

(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
(1)
  • Value for Money
    3.0 (3)
  • Build Quality
    4.7 (3)
  • Ease of Use
    4.0 (3)
  • Battery Life
    3.3 (3)


Tigerben

TigerbenGreater Melbourne (Inner), VIC

  • 2 reviews

Good for general use, but issues once you scratch the surface

published

Purchased in February 2018 for $380.00.

Build Quality
Ease of Use
Battery Life
Value for Money
See all answers

A watch, a fitness tracker, plus more!

published

Haven't worn a watch in 10 years, but was after a GPS fitness tracker. Looks like a watch, week long battery (if lazy), and basic smarts & notifications, including tap-&-pay. No issue with build quality, I work with chainsaws and other machinery and was concerned of damage, nearly a year on not a scratch! Despite it's water resistant rating, I don't shower with it on, it's usually dusty and dirty under the band after work, plus it allows me to charge it.

Purchased in April 2019 for $313.00.

Build Quality
Ease of Use
Battery Life
Value for Money
See all answers
Dmitry

DmitrySydney

  • 4 reviews

BATTERY LIFE

published

This could be a great watch. Sadly, charging it TWICE A DAY made it merely an annoyance. I spent my time tweaking settings, to no avail. And with every firmware update the settings became worse.

There are some glitches like the watch hangs when connecting it to USB cable, solved by a reboot, but the battery life is the worst concern.

Build Quality
Ease of Use
Battery Life
Value for Money
See all answers

See all Garmin Vivoactive 3 reviews

Questions & Answers

Sorry, there are no questions about Garmin Vivoactive 3 Classic but you can read 4 questions about Garmin Vivoactive 3.


Get an answer from our members and Garmin representatives

ProductReview.com.au has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence our content moderation policies in any way, though ProductReview.com.au may earn commissions for products/services purchased via affiliate links.