Average only - expensive for poor durability – I purchased the Dyson Cyclone sometime around 2003 and was not immediately blown away by its capability to clean. It did an average job from the beginning and it died on me about 3 months ago. Overall I would say I was not impressed with my Dyson. Maybe I got a lemon but I will not buy another one. I was at the shop today and the Sauber Intelligence cleaner for $1200.00 at Godfreys would be a far superior cleaner than a Dyson - there is no meaningful comparison really. German/Swiss precision machinery beats the Dyson hands down. Would suggest Dyson sells on its design and not its ability to clean. Manouvres well, stores easily. Simple to remove dust. Suction average at best. Poor durability.
ProductReview.com.au has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence our content moderation policies in any way, though ProductReview.com.au may earn commissions for products/services purchased via affiliate links.
Find it strange you are reviewing a product you bought 8 years ago which stopped working 3 months ago. Also what does German/Swiss precision machinery have to do with how the Dyson performs? Vague cliches about "German/Swiss precision" do not enlighten the reader on how you found the dyson. Why don't you comment on the dyson's performance?