Simply Wall St
Verified4 reviews
- See all
Contradictions in share valuations 84% OVER-valued vs 82% UNDER-valued – *** This issue has been resolved - at least for the moment *** ======================================= Very informative stock market reporting system, however... They send me a regular email that says "DRO is 83.9% OVERVALUED"; the link in their email shows a rather different story! ... * Trading at 82.3% below our estimate of its fair value. * Earnings are forecast to grow 52.62% per year. * Earnings grew by 612.7% over the past year. I sent them a query some weeks ago but got no response. Some might think that an anomaly like this, lowers the trustworthiness of everything they report.
I've been using it for the past 4 years and it's still amazing! – Free, easy to use and love the new features such as stock screener. I can't think of any negatives apart from the fact that it's not completely up to date. If there is an earning call in the morning, you probably have to wait a few days for the website to reflect the new market sentiment. Overall, it is great for long-term and HODL investors
Shills – Screen grab their Big Green Snowflakes every month over say two years, then review them. You'll see what they're up to and who's paying them. New subscribers (suckers) must be their business model. So disappointing for a guy who claimed to be a victim of the game with a mission to put things right.
Good platform for stock analysis – This is a good platform for analysing stocks both ASX as well as international markets. You can build your notional portfolio and track its performance over time. It also gives you intrinsic value of the stocks based on their analysis which you can always use as one of the inputs while evaluating your own investment decisions. It has its flaws as values sometimes are very different to what is in the market. But overall look and feel, analysis quality and ease makes it a very good option for analysing stocks.
ProductReview.com.au has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence our content moderation policies in any way, though ProductReview.com.au may earn commissions for products/services purchased via affiliate links.
A few weeks ago, this 'anomaly' was fixed but now the news-letter says "60.7% Undervalued" but their detailed report says "647.7% OVERvalued"! With differences like this, why bother with their out dated analyses?