Best Canon Digital Cameras

Based on 34 reviews
Brand
Search brand…
Rating
Price
$900 to $2,300
Megapixels
Sensor Size
Max Video Resolution
Frame Rate
Features
Lens Mount
Ports
Colour / Finish

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

4.4 
Summary
RogerVIC15 posts
  Verified

Love it. Great full frame camera – Great camera for video. I use it as my main camera. Maybe not the best for photography? Only con is doesn't have 4K. But i'm not using 4K anyway. Great value for money Show details

Canon Powershot G7X II

Canon Powershot G7X II

4.9 
Summary
JoshVIC2 posts
  Verified

Incredible camera – Was looking for a reasonably priced but high quality camera for vlogging and to capture great photos of my family. The quality that is produced by… Read more

this camera is amazing and the sound with the vlogging comes through crystal clear. So many features and settings to play around with that I’m still yet to test but can only enhance the detail

Canon EOS R50

Canon EOS R50

3.9 
Summary
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • See allThumbnail
nedgoonQLD30 posts
  Verified

We were recently in the market for a new digital camera. My wife is a coloured pencil artist who want's to get high quality reference photos of birds… Read more

and wildlife for her art. Over the years, we've had a plethora of film cameras, digitals and bridge cameras that were good but not top quality. Even the excellent camera in the modern phone could not compare to a modern digital camera for picture quality. A friend loaned to us their Nikon P950 bridge camera to try out. It was a nice camera to use with pretty good picture quality but it had some minor limitations and lower picture quality than we really needed. When we were seriously looking at a new camera to buy for wildlife photography, it came down to a toss up between the Nikon P1100 bridge camera and the Canon EOS R50 mirrorless DSLR. After careful consideration, we chose the Canon. The choice was determined by two factors. #1. The Nikon had a smaller sensor with lower picture quality, has less low light capability, is heavy and was also not immediately available at any local stores and, #2. The Canon was cheaper, has a bigger sensor for better picture quality and is much, much lighter and we could have it right away. The Nikon has 16MP sensor and an impressive 125x optical zoom, equivalent to 24-3000mm and ease of use with no lens changes to worry about. However, the Nikon has a lot of glass and mechanical stuff in that lens casing and is heavy at 1.5kg. That's a lot of weight to carry all the time. The Canon on the other hand has 24MP sensor, it is much lighter than the Nikon. The body alone weighs only 380g and only 529g with the 18-45mm lens attached. It has a bigger APS-C sensor which is over 11x larger than the sensor in the P1100 and with much better low light capability than the Nikon. The Canon came as a 2 lens bundle with 18-45mm (152g) and 55-210mm (310g) lenses. For super long distance shots, I purchased an f11 600mm (940g) prime lens to go with it. Having the interchangeable lenses is a bit of a pfaff when you want to change focal length quickly but it also means that the camera is not heavy all the time. The EOS R50 with the 'huge' 600mm prime weighs 1.3kg vs 1.5kg for the Nikon. With the Canon, we need a carry bag with enough storage space for the camera body and the lenses. This makes the bag a bit bulky. The Nikon is much more compact and has a much smaller bag. I can't comment on the Nikon performance because we haven't used it, so I shan't; but after owning the Canon for a few months now, we have explored most of the many features and functions. Having owned a few "instamatic" and bridge cameras before, this one leaves the others in it's wake. It's by no means the 'Rolls Royce' of cameras, in fact it is a Canon 'entry level' camera. It is a mirrorless camera meaning that unlike an SLR camera, there's no mechanical gizmo to flip a mirror out of the way each time you press the shutter button. This makes it less complicated and lighter too with a longer life due to less mechanical gubbins' to wear out or go wrong. The view finder image is an LCD image from the sensor and not an optical path through the lens but it is still excellent. THE GOOD STUFF: This camera with all it's functions and quality is IMHO best bang-for-buck. It's perfect for a beginner or budget conscious person but with most of the features the more professional cameras have to offer rolled up in a compact package. It has some other nifty feature too, like the wireless connection to your phone or computer to download images. You can also control the camera hands-free from your phone. The image quality is very good and the lenses are easy to change. There is a viewfinder and a fully articulated 'touch screen' LCD display. There is a built-in flash and a 'hot foot' too. I have tried the time lapse function to video the summer storms rolling in and they look amazing. The camera has many cool functions to play with. You can leave it as a point-and-shoot camera set in "auto" mode, or fiddle around with ISO, F stop, shutter speeds and other settings to your heart's content to get the optimal shot. Being a newbie to the world of photography I am impressed with the abilities it gives me. Battery life is better than expected too. THE NOT-SO-GOOD STUFF: My only complaint about this camera is the button layout. All the buttons to change modes and do other functions are located on the right hand side (handle) of the body around where your right hand goes. This is convenient for operation but it means that they are susceptible to accidental pushing of the buttons just by holding the camera. It's just a minor 'first world' problem and something to get used to I guess. The EOS R50, like most DSLR cameras is susceptible to weather. There is no weather sealing so be careful to not get it wet. LENSES: Our camera came as a bundle with two lenses included. The lens hoods are not included but are available separately. The 18-45mm is perfect for family snaps, general photography and close-up's. The 55-210mm is best for sports and wildlife photography. The lenses are of the (12 contact) RF-S family and the RF mount is not compatible with the older (8 contact) EF lenses. However, there is an accessory adaptor ring available to allow EF lenses to be used on the RF mount. So, if you've got an old Canon, you can use the old lenses on the new camera but you need to purchase the adaptor. There is a wide variety of lenses from canon and other manufacturers like Sigma and Tamron available for this camera that can suite all needs. The EOS R50 camera body does not have image stabilisation. However, the RF-S (S for Stabilisation) lenses do carry that feature. CONCLUSION: I'm very pleased and impressed with our Canon. If you want a good all round but budget camera with all the bells and whistles, you can't go past the Canon EOS R50. It has all the tricks and trappings of expensive cameras at a fraction of the cost. It's light and compact and perfect for beginners and anyone wanting a good quality DSLR without spending a fortune.

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

4.2 
Summary
PunkyQLD12 posts
 

Good for amateur bird photography – High zoom (1350mm equivalent) makes it good for identification purposes at home. Reasonably light and compact. Can't charge battery in situ; android… Read more

transfer app is currently useless, so you need to use a cable for transfer to a PC; not good at low light; relatively inexpensive at several hundred dollars. You are not going to be able to enlarge a photo to "poster size" without pixelation - A4 is fine. Am yet to try "tracking" or many features and using all automatic setting. Suits my needs for at home bird identification.

Canon 5D EOS Mark IV

Canon 5D EOS Mark IV

5.0 
Summary
VacublasterVIC128 posts
 

I Love this Camera – Call me old fashioned liking a DSLR when everyone is going mirror-less but, I have my reasons for that mainly to do with the viewfinder. I have owned… Read more

every 5D and I have to say that the Mk4 has the features that the Mk3 should have had such as built in GPS, NFC and WiFi. Having said that the camera feels and performs well in this competitive world and whilst it is large and heavy compared to a mirror-less body, at least it feels like value for money.

The other issue as cameras get smaller is that they don't fit my hand and I find that I'm holding them with two fingers but, not the Mk4, it fits my hand very well. Also with a DSLR there is space for quick access buttons and they haven't disappeared into a menu like on some cameras.

I could write on about the features on the camera but, this review would get pages long so I'll tell you about the only thing I dislike, the dual card slot. With the Mk3 the camera stuck with your choice to be the main card to save to and when you removed the card it would switch to the other card until you put the card back and it would switch back to the main card again. Not with the Mk4, if you remove the CF card it switches to the SD card but, when you put the CF back it stays on the SD and I find this absolutely irritating because you only notice when your continuous frame rate falls because you've switched to the SD card.

This is a great camera that only has one silly issue and I would recommend it to anyone wanting a top quality DSLR.

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

5.0 
Summary
steveWA4 posts
 

Excellent – Bought the canon after reading many articles, and asking salespeople to recommend a camera, I had a Fuji which had a very difficult menu system that… Read more

put me off photography, but thus menu on the canon is intuitive, (but like the apple computer over Microsoft) everything seems so straightforward there are terms and settings I still don’t understand, but the shop said to pop by anytime for advice. This camera exudes quality, not cheap but worth the extra. Very pleased with the quality and ease of settings and very helpful staff at camera electronics.

Just to add to this 6 months on, The colours you get from this camera are incredible, I use a Nisi polarising filter, and shoot in Raw mode, I also subscribe to Lightroom, which is a new learning curve for me, and prob need more utube hours to perfect, but I just printed a selection of my photos and I was blown away with the colours and quality, even the lady who processed the pics commented on them as I picked them up, (never had that before!) I think the full frame is a must for anyone wanting quality, it’s 24.000 mega pixels, which seems adequate, if I had money I’d definitely look at the new R5, but that’s up there price wise for a hobbyist, I only buy L series lenses, which is what you need if your a perfectionist! Although I just bout a 15mm f2.8 standard lens, less than 500$, as I want to try some astrology pics, and maybe I’ll trade up if I get into it. But was told the quality difference isn’t as noticeable with this type of photography, the fast lens is more important for now. Anyway this is my experience, years ago I had minolta 9000, film camera which I loved, and a entry model Fuji which I found complicated, apart from that I’ve never used a Nikon, which was on my list when I chose the canon because the salesmen all favoured the canon and because of the menu system, and I have no regrets!

Canon EOS 90D

Canon EOS 90D

3.1 
Summary
Gillian A.QLD9 posts
  Verified

Not fit for purpose! – WE Bought this camera for my Photo Booth business for $1,873, Arrived Mid February 2023. This is the 6th Camera we have bought for our Business and… Read more

the first that has a problem. We tested it before sending out to it's first Photo Booth Job where it is supposed to run for hours at a time. The Camera froze within 20-30 Minutes of it's first Photo Booth use. We had to refund client in full. On retesting the new Camera over and over again at home, We found that the Camera would work fine for the first 20 minutes to 40 minutes and then freeze up over and over again, Which is why we were lulled into a false sense of security of all being OK when we first tested after buying and before sending out to it's first photo Booth show. My Husband got in touch with Canon and sent it back to New south wales for testing with an email explaining they must run the camera for at least a few hours as it freezes at different times. My husband also explained this to various customer service people over this time seemingly in an Asian Country...Not Australia . My husband was speaking to people apparently in the Philippines even though he asked to be put through to Customer care in Australia. We sent The Camera off to Sydney from QLD at our own cost of $71 and hoped that someone will get back to us as we are losing $Thousands from having no Camera to put in our photo Booth. 5 weeks later my husband phoned as we hadn't heard back and again got put through to the Philippines only to speak to someone who really had no idea what was going on and no Idea that the Camera was supposed to be tested for continuous use of a few hours due to freezing at different times. My husband was told that it was tested and works fine but not tested for any length of time as we requested, He was told someone will get back to us and that was a few days ago and still no answer, meanwhile we are still losing $money which my husband explained to the Guy. My husband also told him I would like to talk to the Sydney Office as this is where our camera was sent to. So we spent nearly $2000 for a new camera to put in our Photo Booth to carry on our Business and have nothing to show for it, Just a Refund we had to pay back to my Client and an empty photo Booth Shell that we have no camera for. We think we should get our money back in full seeing that this Camera isn't fit for the purpose we bought it for. Canon won't let us speak to anyone in Australia therefore we can't pin anyone one person down to get to test this camera Appropriately ( Hours not Minutes!) When/If Canon get around to sending our New Unused camera back, 100% we will not have the ability to use it for what it was bought for as it will freeze again and again as before! We will be writing to the ACCC and Consumer Affairs and share this review around as much as possible until we either get a full Refund or Canon actually tests our Camera and finds out why it keeps freezing, rendering our business purchase of this Camera unfit for purpose. The Worst after sales service we have ever come across!

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

3.6 
Summary
Maurice G BoyceNSW83 posts
  Verified

Excellent 40X Zoom, But – I purchased this camera because it is a pocket sized camera and has an amazing zoom. Also it is a Canon. None of the other manufacturers seem to have… Read more

anything similar. Picture quality is disappointing but images do respond reasonably well to sharpening using a photo edit facility. (But this is very time consuming) The build quality is just OK but the lense cover shutter mechanism has jammed on more than one occasion. It is flimsey. The internal file numbering system is basic and has no dates or other info. The lack of in-camera battery charging is primative and often inconvenient. Likewise the need to remove the SD card to download pictures also seems rather primative. The on-board menu system is comprehensive and easy to use.

Canon Powershot G7X III

Canon Powershot G7X III

3.3 
Summary
$1,199RRP
BTS C.2 posts
 

Best camera to take social media pictures, would highly recomend it to anyone looking for a simple yet effective lens solution.

Canon EOS R5

Canon EOS R5

2.5 
Summary
RazzH2 posts
 

Learning to Handle Briliance – My R5 with Canon lenses has performed better and better as I have become used to handling the features that are new to me. Tracking focus Has turned… Read more

out to be a brilliant addition to my photographic experience as I've learnt how to use it well. Battery life is shorter when tracking is always on but that is a small price to pay for the great results.

Canon EOS R5 C

Canon EOS R5 C

5.0 
Summary
NoelVIC2 posts
 

Once again CCC WAREHOUSE have not failed to disappoint. Canon R5C was delivered on time before Easter hols. Product works fine, delivered by DHL and in excellent packing at a competitive price too. Thank you Michael and Andy. Show details

Canon EOS R7

Canon EOS R7

5.0 
Summary
$2,299RRP
Phil.SNSW20 posts
  Verified

This camera is genius for its price and offers a photography enthusiast much of what the top end Canon cameras offer professionals for a fraction of… Read more

the price..

BREAKING NEWS**** I HAVE READ THAT AN EOS R7 mark ii MIGHT BE DUE FOR RELEASE**** THIS REVIEW WONT APPLY TO THAT NEW MODEL

There is a compromise with this camera. It uses a cropped sensor which gives a 1.6 times increase in focal length for a standard RF Canon lens and might give rise to visual "noise" in some images. A 100mm RF lens has the effective focal length of a 160mm lens on this camera. The supplied lens is a kit lens which is an "STM" lens. It is an 18mm to 150mm zoom which is almost as sharp as a full frame RF lens. Canon makes a 25mm-105 RF lens which does not offer the same wide angle or zoom. There is a different RF zoom lens made for this camera by Sigma that is 16mm - 300 mm and from reviews it is as good as the Kit lens. Both lenses are far more practical than the full frame Canon lenses. I have purchased this Sigma lens and I find it better than the reviews say it is. I use it in the range of f7.1 to f14 with a minimum exposure of 1/500 and AUTO ISO up to 6400.

Some critics say that cropped sensors contribute to "noise" or speckling and discoloration of images taken at high speed and high ISO settings. I am finding little evidence of such issues. See the attached photos.

I have a powerful earlier generation 600RT flash plus an EF 70mm-200mm lens which can both be used on my new camera. This lens needs an adaptor and it works on this camera.

The camera body itself works exceptionally well. It is in the area of new features that I am coming to terms with this camera. It uses web-enabled wi-fi with printers and smartphones. It chews up battery power to connect to these and a day's photography takes the full charge of a battery. However, I can switch the camera to aircraft mode turning off wi-fi and that makes it very efficient in its battery life.

It is possible to print directly from the camera with a wi-fi connection. This takes time and practice. Powerful autofocus functions which have a tracking capability for moving targets, work well, but they take a bit of getting used to.

I have taken a short course from a company called Widescenes Photography to learn how to get the most benefit out of this camera. I have given it 4 stars for its technical perfection When Canon improves its useability with Wi fi it will get 5 stars.

Canon EOS R100

Canon EOS R100

4.0 
Summary
$999RRP
EvaluateQLD99 posts
 

Great entry level camera with all the mirrorless DSLR stuff you’d need. Video quality is good but not as great as similar priced Canon cameras like… Read more

the M50 Mark II. It is NOT a full frame camera - it has a smaller sensor - but that means it’s lighter to hold which can become important when travelling or shooting for long periods - and also for smaller wrists, making it a better option for children (compared to heavier and more costly cameras).

Canon EOS RP

Canon EOS RP

4.0 
Summary
ShaxpierNSW120 posts
  Verified

Still Competitive – I bought mine used, but there are some interesting kit options new. Overall the camera feels very up to date. To get the most out of it there is a… Read more

learning curve, but I don't think it's overwhelming if you really are interested. If you are not interested in learning photography I would look lower down in price in the APS C (R series if want the latest and the way it's trending). Phones can't do sports and wildlife/action well, and APS does that very well. Other makes exist but I do not have enough knowledge to properly contemplate them.

There are many reviews out there, and I am just a hobbyist re-entering serious cameras.

Its main downside online is its lack of DR (dynamic range). It's something to be looked at BUT if you are not looking to spend time editing post-camera picture taking I would not get too distracted by it. Any wedding photographer was happy with less not too many years ago. Nonetheless, if you are a mid-afternoon white street with narrow dark alleyways person, and you want as much as possible to be contemplated (not blown out or underexposed) better options exist for sure. However, its bracketing options (common thing) allow good making-up grounds. Top trump types may also forget that this camera does really well at maintaning it's DR higher up the ISO than some measuring more in the headlines. It's really quite a nice performer for nonextreme anything and better across the board than many might first assume.

It's big enough to allow enough buttons (usage cases) to be easily accessible. If you are a keen guardian looking at your kid playing sport I doubt more is needed (been there and done it with less).

It's a full frame camera. Really great glass (lenses) are big, heavy and amazingly expensive. This camera lends towards wide and shallow easily, but can do the lot. I encourage anyone to remember APS C is also more capable of this than many might say.

If I were buying new I would probably go APS C, unless I really new what I wanted. If I were leaping toward FF I would probably veer the R8 if buying new, but this camera is still very good and if it came with a lens I really wanted I would look hard at it after understanding its nuances.

I can say I find the Canon editing software that Canon users get to be excellent. Serious photographers can debate more, but for free it's also as much as most will ever care about, IMO.

This is a very good camera. Checked against your usage case scenario and more study it might be right.

Canon EOS 1500D

Canon EOS 1500D

No reviews
Summary
Canon EOS R3

Canon EOS R3

No reviews
Summary